Aaron Pott has spent much of his career learning how much a winemaker should control. His training took him from UC Davis to Burgundy and Bordeaux, where he worked with some of the most influential winemakers of his generation before returning to Napa Valley. Over time, he became convinced that the best wines often come from resisting the urge to force a vineyard into a predetermined style.

That philosophy now shapes Pott Wine, the family-owned label he runs with his wife, Claire, from their property high on Mount Veeder. It also explains why Pott talks about winemaking less as authorship than stewardship. The winemaker still makes countless decisions, but the objective is to help the site express itself rather than overwhelm it.

Great Wine Starts Before the Cellar

Pott’s education in winemaking began early, but his understanding of vineyards came later. After studying winemaking at UC Davis, he pursued a master’s degree in Burgundy because a mentor told him he understood only half of the equation. Knowing how to make wine meant little if he did not understand how the grapes themselves were grown.

Burgundy reinforced the importance of site, particularly through Pinot Noir, a grape known for expressing differences in soil, climate, and growing conditions. Pott later moved to Bordeaux, where he became winemaker at Château Troplong Mondot during a period of experimentation and rapid change in Saint-Émilion. He describes the region in the 1990s as a place where new techniques, ideas, and personalities were reshaping how people thought about wine.

Those experiences taught him to look first at what a vineyard could naturally produce. Weather, geology, altitude, and soil cannot be redesigned to fit a winemaker’s preferences, while yields, canopy management, water, and farming practices can be adjusted. The craft lies in understanding which elements deserve intervention and which ones should be left alone.

Mount Veeder Gave Him Something Specific to Work With

When Pott and his wife bought their first 75 acres on Mount Veeder, they were not simply looking for a scenic Napa property. Pott was particularly interested in Cabernet Franc and wanted land with the kind of soil that could support the variety well.

He found an unusual site roughly 1,600 feet above the valley on uplifted ancient seafloor along the flank of a volcano. The property eventually grew to about 360 acres, though only a small portion is planted to vineyard. The rest remains forest and wild land populated by bears, mountain lions, foxes, and other animals that regularly appear on the property’s cameras.

That ratio is important to Pott. The vineyard has been farmed organically from its beginning, without chemical agriculture, and its relatively small footprint allows the family to concentrate on the character of a specific place rather than chase volume.

Pott Wine emerged gradually from that property and from vineyards he already knew through his consulting work. The first wines were released around the financial crisis, which made selling out the initial production particularly encouraging. Instead of responding by trying to become much larger, Pott kept the operation deliberately small.

Small Scale Gives the Winemaker More Control

Pott has spent years consulting for established wineries, which gave him a close view of how different businesses approach scale, production, and quality. His own label follows a much simpler model.

The company is essentially Pott, his wife, and their two daughters. The wines are sold largely through direct relationships and allocations, allowing the family to stay close to customers while avoiding some of the pressures that come with wider distribution.

That structure also protects the thing Pott values most: attention. He does not talk about growth as an automatic measure of success. When asked where he wants the company to be several years from now, his answer is essentially where it is today, with enough scale to support the family and enough time to concentrate on making better wine.

That position is unusual in an industry where expansion can easily become its own objective. Pott sees no reason to produce more simply because production could increase.

Nonalcoholic Wine Required the Opposite Approach

Pott’s work on Missing Thorn, a nonalcoholic wine project, forced him to rethink many of the instincts he developed around traditional wine.

With Pott Wine, he tries to interfere as little as possible with what the vineyard produces. Nonalcoholic wine requires far more reconstruction because removing alcohol also changes the texture, aroma, and overall experience of the finished product.

Pott describes the process as taking wine apart and putting it back together. He uses naturally derived flavor components to restore characteristics that disappear during alcohol removal, relying partly on his memory of great wines to judge what is missing.

The project initially made him uncomfortable because it ran against his preference for minimal intervention. Yet that discomfort was part of the appeal. Friends who had stopped drinking for health or personal reasons convinced him there was a legitimate problem to solve, particularly because many existing products did not taste much like wine.

Missing Thorn therefore required a different form of craftsmanship. Instead of stepping aside so a vineyard could speak, Pott had to decide deliberately what belonged in the glass.

Craftsmanship Is Knowing Which Job You Are Doing

The contrast between Pott Wine and Missing Thorn reveals something broader about Pott’s approach. He does not treat one winemaking philosophy as appropriate for every problem.

A great vineyard asks for restraint. A de-alcoholized wine may require careful reconstruction. Consulting for another estate demands understanding what that property can become rather than reproducing the style of his own wines.

The common thread is attention to the material in front of him. Pott’s career has taken him through celebrated French estates, Napa consulting projects, an organic mountain vineyard, and an experiment in nonalcoholic wine, but the underlying discipline has remained remarkably consistent.

Good craftsmanship, in his view, begins by understanding what the situation is asking for. Sometimes the hardest and most skillful decision is knowing how much to do, and when to step back.

Want more From the Ground Up? Check out more articles or head over to YouTube, Apple, or Spotify to watch the videos.